Neil J. Zemmel, MD, FACS
Megan J. Goff, PA-C
Rachel M. Duke, NP, CANS
Short Pump Office
11934 W Broad Street, Suite 200
Richmond, VA 23233
804-464-3801

Online Bill Pay VIP Program

Location Location
Email Us Email Us

Constricted Breast Repair

Back to Gallery!Constricted Breast Repair Gallery

Patient 1

BeforeAfter*

Age: 22 years

Height: 5’ 3”

Weight: 155 pounds
Preop: 34 A
Postop: 34 C

Implant Size: 350 cc smooth round moderate profile plus silicone implants
Incision/Location: Periareolar, submuscular dual plane I

Notes: This patient has moderate constricted breast deformity. Her breasts are characterized by a narrow base width, an elevated, narrow, and tight inframammary fold (breast crease) and a “tubular” shape. The goal for her surgery was to increase her breast volume and create a round, more proportional breast shape. In addition to placing implants, the breast creases were widened and lowered. Incisions were made in the tissue of the breast from the inside to create a rounder breast shape.
She is shown 1 year after surgery and is very pleased.

Patient 2

BeforeAfter*

Age: 25 years

Height: 5’ 3”

Weight: 160 pounds
Preop: 34 A
Postop: 34 C

Implant Size: 350 cc smooth round moderate profile plus silicone implants

Incision/Location: Periareolar, submuscular dual plane I

Notes: This patient has moderate constricted breast deformity as well as severe breast asymmetry. Her breasts are characterized by a narrow base width, an elevated, narrow, and tight inframammary fold (breast crease) and a “tubular” shape. The left is more severe than the right. The goal for her surgery was to increase her breast volume, improve symmetry, and create a round, more proportional breast shape. In addition to placing implants, the breast creases were widened and lowered. Incisions were made in the tissue of the breast from the inside to create a rounder breast shape. A periareolar mastopexy was also performed to reduce the conical shape of the left breast, to tighten the breast skin, and reduce the areolar diameter on both sides.
She is shown 1 year after surgery and is very pleased.

Patient 3

BeforeAfter*

Age: 30 years
Height: 5’ 3”
Weight: 130 pounds
Preop: 34 A
Postop: 34 C
Implant Size: Allergan Style SRM Silicone R 375cc L 345cc.
Incision/Location: Periareolar (donut) lift performed
Notes: Patient shown 6 months after surgery.

Patient 4

BeforeAfter*

Age: 31 years
Height: 5’ 4”
Weight: 125 pounds
Preop: 34 A
Postop: 34 B/C
Implant Size:  Allergan Style SRM Silicone R 345cc
Incision/Location: periareolar, submuscular
Notes: Patient shown 4 months after surgery.

*Individual Results May Vary

Zwivel Consult Feature